Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 00:32
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Something Big Is Twisting Mercury’s Crust - Gizmodo
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Newspaper headlines: Spending Review 'renewing Britain' or 'reckless splurge' - BBC
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
NASA is already great. Right now. - NASA Watch
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
The 2025 Bootid meteor shower peaks June 27: Here's what to expect - Space
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why don’t the little sugar breeches gun owners understand that life isn’t all sunshine and rainbows?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
This galaxy cluster has mysterious cosmic tendrils over 200,000 light-years long (image) - Space
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.